Question:
What are the technological issues that have to be resolved for organic EL displays?
Definitely lifespan and efficiency. If we could achieve lifespans that support today's portable devices I think the state of the art as it stands now would be sufficient for practical applications. But for television we will have to go up to the next level. With regard to efficiency, we're still not getting 100% of OEL's potential, and there's room to grow, so I think there's a lot more research that must be done. Of course, if the efficiency increases so will the lifespan. I believe that by 2004-2005, lifespans will increase tenfold thus making the technology feasible for television applications.
Also, there is a lot of competition between the low molecular weight and high molecular weight researchers, but I think rather than competing we should focus on the low molecular designs first, and then move naturally into the high molecular work. At this point we don't have all the materials necessary to manufacture products using high molecular weight technology, so it's not practical to go in that direction.
As a manufacturing process inkjet coating is the ultimate, so I definitely want to use it. If high molecular designs lose out to low molecular ones, the high molecular work will be abandoned. Instead of competing, I wish the people doing high molecular weight research would take more time and get it right.
If we achieve the lifespans of 10,000 hours needed for television, the need for developing new materials will go away, and research at universities along with it. Besides displays, there are other applications such as fluorescent-style lighting. There are several methods for outputting white but they're rather complicated so I think there's a lot of work that can be done at universities. Still, after 5 or maybe 10 years at the latest, much of the university work will be gone.
|