Honeywell and Yokogawa have both been producing Distributed Control System (DCS) platforms for decades, and both are very active in this area. In 1975, Honeywell introduced its TDC2000 platform and Yokogawa brought out CENTUM. These two competing systems emerged from a similar place, oil refining and petrochemical industries, so they started out with similar basic concepts and use cases in mind.
TDC2000 was Honeywell’s main offering until 1985 when it was supplanted by TDC3000, which carried the flag for about 10 years until it was replaced by Experion in 1995. In some respects, Honeywell has been hurt by its own early success. There is still a large installed base of those first two systems, which suggests the company has had limited success driving its users to the newer Experion platform. Honeywell says it will continue support for TDC2000 until 2018 and the TDC3000 until 2024, although prices for spare parts will undoubtedly climb.
Naturally there are multiple migration paths for both of Honeywell’s legacy systems: TDC2000 can move to TDC3000 (although the sensibility of moving from one legacy system to another is debatable), or either system can move to Experion PKS (process knowledge system) or Orion. Some users who have made such a change to Experion have reported problems working with it due to network performance constraints, which has likely slowed adoption of the newer platform.
Users of these old Honeywell platforms can also consider a change to Yokogawa’s CENTUM family. The mechanics of making such a change are not very different from migrating to newer Honeywell platforms, but can deliver a valuable set of advantages.
CENTUM CS 3000 was first released in 1998 and was Yokogawa’s first integrated DCS with HMIs running on Microsoft Windows. It is fully interoperable with the earlier CS platform, as well as CENTUM VP that followed it. Sidebar with image
Yokogawa has developed a series of hardware devices designed specifically to interface with existing TDC2000 cabinets to ensure that migration to CS 3000 R3 causes the least disruption of production. This migration methodology also reuses as much of the installed equipment as possible without compromising the functional advantages of the new system. Field devices, wiring and terminal boards can be preserved while replacing the HMIs, main controller and backbone networks. The parts of the system where the greatest gains can be realized are renewed, while the areas where there are few functional improvements possible are left in place.
The actual changeover can follow different strategies depending on the specific hardware and operational needs of the plant. Some users want a hot cutover, while others prefer a shutdown of several days. Yokogawa has performed numerous of both types of migrations and has designed a variety of tools and specialized devices to make the process as simple as possible, with minimal risk and fast implementation time.
Owners of Honeywell systems can certainly stay with the company and select an appropriate migration strategy from those available. However, many of those users have chosen to move to Yokogawa for a variety of reasons. CENTUM and Yokogawa’s methodology offer many ways to improve operational excellence while minimizing the cost of migrating to a new DCS platform. While users considering a migration project might get caught up in technical details, it is important to keep sight of the potential improvements possible with a newer and better DCS.
The underlying concepts of CENTUM inherent in all its versions are safety, reliability and productivity carried through the whole system lifecycle. Technical improvements are important, but only to the extent they concur with these basic concepts. Lifecycle excellence is what ties this concept together, and the other elements all support it.
Most companies interested in moving from Honeywell to Yokogawa are not looking for a like-for-like system simply running on newer hardware. They are looking for more meaningful functional improvements capable of delivering business value. So what are some of those improvements?
Safety—Every DCS has to incorporate safety capabilities, but Yokogawa adds a high degree of sophistication. The implementation of safety loops is designed to minimize false trips, thereby supporting plant availability, along with information exchange with safety devices. When safety devices can provide diagnostic information, they prove the ability to act positively and in a predictable manner in the event of an actual incident.
Asset performance—Yokogawa’s solutions adds the ability to gather field diagnostic information and deliver it to an asset management platform. The ability to see how equipment is performing and use it to guide maintenance efforts can reduce downtime, improve maintenance efficiency and boost overall asset performance. Old DCS platforms, and even many migration strategies to other systems, often overlook this capability and do not add connectivity to interact fully with smart devices.
Production agility and adaptability—Legacy systems are not known for their flexibility. While many older platforms had impressive capabilities, there were few tools or software libraries to perform programming, and most users had to write custom code to add needed functionality. Newer platforms, such as CENTUM, offer many solution-based packages which can be implemented instead of custom coding. Consultative services are available and are aimed at goal-oriented productivity. Users of these newer systems find it easier to get critical information to the right people, who then use this real-time production information to support faster decisions and easier process optimization.
Yokogawa pulls all these capabilities and more together in a comprehensive suite of solution services. It helps customers achieve quick ROI by improving the effectiveness of their plant automation systems while reducing total cost of ownership.
Retaining Older Functionality
Maintaining a TDC2000 or 3000 system in its original state is possible under Honeywell’s support plan for the foreseeable future. However, this approach does nothing to improve the system’s capabilities. All the limitations of its architecture remain in place, locking the user into the constraints of 20 or 30 years ago. Migration can be postponed, but must eventually occur, and is often best done sooner rather than later.
Yokogawa’s CENTUM VP platform represents the most advanced version of the system, yet companies with earlier versions (CENTUM CS1000 or CS3000), even those installed 20 years ago, can update to this latest version with nothing more than loading new software. Retaining this kind of backward compatibility has been a major advantage of Yokogawa’s platform going back to its earliest versions.
When compared against Honeywell’s legacy systems, CENTUM VP offers huge advantages, but it also competes very well when the current platforms from both companies are compared head-to-head. A user considering a full migration to Honeywell’s Experion PKS Orion should explore CENTUM for a variety of reasons:
- Proven reliability with 99.99999% availability built on pair-and-spare technology.
- Different software revision levels can coexist on the same system without restrictions. Only the engineering station needs to be the latest revision, so other areas can be updated as convenient.
- Alarm management strategies follow ISA18.2 and EEMUA 191 guidelines.
- Exapilot is the only MPA platform designed to follow ISA106 strategies.
- Controllers guarantee 1 ms resolution even with integrated sequence of events.
Technology Versus Productivity
Companies considering a move to a new DCS generally become preoccupied with technology. This isn’t surprising, but it turns the focus away from where it really belongs: productivity. A DCS exists to support process plant manufacturing, and users should concentrate on how it helps a plant and its people do the best job possible. Questions of how it communicates or what devices it supports are certainly relevant, but how does it improve upon what the plant is doing now?
A DCS installed today will easily last 20 years and probably even longer. During those decades an enormous personnel shift will take place as the entire baby-boomer generation retires and millennials move into mid-career. With fewer skilled operators, automation systems will need to be highly intuitive and provide a variety of tools to improve plant performance and maintain safety. CENTUM VP integrates plant information management, asset management and operation support functions such as Modular Procedural Automation into a unified environment to help all generations of operators improve plant performance.
식품 제조업에서는 「음식의 안전 · 안심」에 대해 매우 높은 품질이 요구되고 있는 가운데, 더욱 경쟁력을 강화하기 위해서는 공장 전체의 비용 절감에 달려있다고 생각합니다. Yokogawa는 일상적인 개선 사이클은 물론, IIoT를 활용하여 불량을 내지 않는 철저한 손실 감축을 위한 환경 만들기를 지원합니다.
오일 및 가스
Yokogawa는 해상 및 육상 시설에서 파이프라인, 터미널 및 심해 운전에 이르기까지 석유 및 가스 사업의 모든 부분에서 풍부한 경험을 보유하고 있습니다. 우리는 안전을 강화하고 정확하고 신뢰성 있는 운전을 보장하며 플랜트 효율을 높이는 솔루션을 제공합니다.
1970년대 중반, Yokogawa는 EBS 전기 제어 시스템 (EBS Electric Control System)의 출시와 함께 전력 사업에 진출했습니다. 그 이후로 Yokogawa는 전 세계 고객에게 최상의 서비스와 솔루션을 제공하기 위한 기술과 역량의 개발을 꾸준히 지속해 왔습니다.
Yokogawa는 역동적인 글로벌 전력 시장에서 더욱 적극적인 역할을 수행하기 위해 글로벌 전력 솔루션 네트워크를 운영했습니다. 이로 인해 Yokogawa 내에서 보다 긴밀한 팀워크가 가능해져서 글로벌 리소스와 업계 노하우를 하나로 모았습니다. Yokogawa의 전력 산업 전문가들은 각 고객에게 정교한 요구 사항에 가장 적합한 솔루션을 제공하기 위해 협력합니다.
철강 산업에서는 제품뿐만 아니라 제조 및 운영 기술의 품질을 향상시키고 환경 및 에너지 효율 문제를 해결하는 것 또한 중요합니다. Yokogawa는 고객이 이상적인 플랜트를 만들 수 있도록 돕고 동반 성장을 위해 발전해 나가고 있습니다.
화학 플랜트는 연속 및 Batch 생산 공정에 의존하며, 각각은 제어 시스템에 대한 다양한 요구 사항을 제시합니다. 연속 공정은 실패하지 않고 생산 라인을 중단시키는 견고하고 안정적인 제어 시스템을 필요로하는 반면, Batch 공정의 중요성은 수식, 절차 및 공정을 조정하는 데 있어 큰 유연성을 허용하는 제어 시스템을 갖추는 데 있습니다. 두 종류의 시스템 모두 제품의 사용 가능한 품질 내역에서 관리되어야 하며 비일상적인 작업을 수행할 수 있어야 합니다. Yokogawa는 광범위한 제품 포트폴리오, 숙련된 시스템 엔지니어 및 글로벌 영업 및 서비스 네트워크를 통해 모든 공장 공정에 대한 솔루션을 제공합니다.
Related Products & Solutions
분산 제어 시스템 (DCS)
Yokogawa는 프로세스 자동화를 위해서 중요한 운영 인프라를 제공합니다. 분산제어시스템(DCS)은 플랜트 또는 산업 공정의 자동화 된 제어 및 운영을 위한 플랫폼입니다. 10,000개 이상의 플랜트에서 고객의 생산 목표 달성하기 위해서 Yokogawa DCS가 적용되었습니다.